The Philippines in a Political Hunger Games

While the world’s major powers are busy negotiating trade and managing geopolitical rivalries, the Philippines appears trapped in an entirely different reality show, one part political soap opera, one part institutional demolition derby, and one part political elite survival game.

Last May 14-15, 2026, Washington and Beijing recalibrated their relations, like mature powers who understand that dialogue is cheaper than war, when Trump visited China. The Marcos administration, on the other hand, seems determined to turn the Philippines into Southeast Asia’s most unstable political theater both domestically and regionally – one political scandal after another, one constitutional controversy after another, and one public institutional clash after another.

The country is no longer making international headlines because of economic breakthroughs, industrial transformation, or scientific achievements. Instead, the Philippines has become globally recognizable for political chaos, elite infighting, and increasingly theatrical displays of state power.

The latest controversy, involving allegations by Senator Imee Marcos that NBI (National Bureau of Investigation) agents were ordered to arrest Senator Bato dela Rosa “at all costs,” because of an International Criminal Court (ICC) Warrant of Arrest, only deepens the perception that governance in the country is dangerously drifting from democratic sobriety into political vendetta. 

Whether true or not, the damage is already done. Why? Because the statement reinforces a growing public perception that the Philippine state is increasingly being weaponized for internal political warfare rather than national governance. And that is a dangerous image for any democracy.

The irony is almost poetic. The Marcos presidency entered office under the slogan of “unity.” Yet what Filipinos have witnessed instead is political fragmentation, institutional instability, endless factional conflict, and a government seemingly consumed by its own internal wars.

At times, it feels less like governance and more like an elite version of The Hunger Games — except the tributes are political dynasties, the arena is Malacañang, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and the Filipino people are unwilling spectators paying for the entire production through taxes, inflation, debt, and economic anxiety.

Meanwhile, the geopolitical contradictions are becoming harder to ignore. Even the United States and China, fierce strategic competitors, continue to maintain dialogue because both understand that confrontation without communication is catastrophic. Yet the Marcos administration’s foreign policy posture is confrontational toward China, heavily leaning on Washington, positioning itself as a frontline state for the U.S. in the Indo-Pacific region. 

Indeed, the Philippines increasingly looks like a country volunteering as a proxy in someone else’s great-power rivalry while simultaneously imploding domestically. And that is perhaps the greatest tragedy of all.

A nation blessed with strategic geography, talented people, abundant resources, and enormous economic potential is once again being suffocated by the oldest Filipino political disease: elite power struggles masquerading as national destiny.

At this point, the real question is no longer whether the country is in a political crisis. The real question is: Who in power is still actually governing?

Source: The Lobbyist
https://www.thelobbyist.biz/perspectives/article-details/prime%20insight/the-philippines-in-a-political-hunger-games

Prof. Anna Rosario Malindog-Uy

Prof. Anna Rosario Malindog-Uy is a Ph.D. Candidate at the Institute of South-South Cooperation and Development (ISSCAD), Peking University, Beijing, China. Currently, she is a Senior Researcher of the South China Sea Probing Initiative (SCSPI) and a Senior Research Fellow of the Global Governance Institution (GGI). Prof. Anna Uy taught Political Science, International Relations, Development Studies, European Studies, Southeast Asia, and China Studies. She is a researcher-writer, academic, and consultant on a wide array of issues. She has worked as a consultant with the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and other local and international NGOs.