When the World’s Chokepoint Becomes Manila’s Crisis

If the Strait of Hormuz is effectively closed, the impact on the Philippines would be immediate, structural, and multi-layered, even though PH is geographically far from the Gulf. The strategic reality:

1. Energy Shock → Domestic Inflation. Around 20–30% of global oil supply passes through Hormuz.. A closure means: Global oil prices spike sharply, LNG flows tighten, and shipping insurance premiums surge.

For the Philippines, a net energy importer, this translates into:

  • ✔ Higher fuel prices
  • ✔ Higher electricity costs
  • ✔ Transport fare pressure
  • ✔ Food price escalation (logistics-driven inflation)

This becomes imported inflation, beyond BSP (Central Bank) control.

Expect the following :

  • ➡️ Peso depreciation pressure
  • ➡️ Wider current account deficit
  • ➡️ Slower growth

2. Supply Chain Disruption – Even if PH oil does not come directly from the Gulf, pricing is global benchmarked. Hormuz disruption will:

  • Tighten tanker availability
  • Reroute shipping
  • Delay deliveries
  • Increase freight costs

What are the Results…

  • ➡️ Manufacturing cost increases
  • ➡️ Construction delays
  • ➡️ Fertilizer cost spikes (impacting agriculture)

3. OFW Vulnerability: Over 2 million Filipinos live/work in the Gulf. Escalation in UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, could mean:

  • ✔ Repatriation risks
  • ✔ Job displacement
  • ✔ Remittance slowdown

Remittances = to more or less 9% of PH GDP

Even a temporary disruption affects:

  • ➡️ Consumption
  • ➡️ Peso stability
  • ➡️ Banking liquidity

4. Maritime Insurance & Trade – Hormuz closure will push: War risk premiums up and global shipping costs higher. Philippine imports will be affected in terms of

  • ✔ Fuel
  • ✔ Wheat
  • ✔ Fertilizers
  • ✔ Machinery

This feeds directly into:

  • ➡️ Food inflation
  • ➡️ Construction slowdown
  • ➡️ Industrial cost escalation

5. Strategic Spillover – This is where the EDCA sites (U.S. bases) concern becomes relevant and imperative..

Hormuz closure signals:

  • ➡️ A widening U.S.–Iran confrontation
  • ➡️ Global force posture shifts
  • ➡️ Potential forward deployment expansions

Meaning: U.S. alliance networks, including the Indo-Pacific may become more operationally activated.

In escalation logic Forward-access states (like the Philippines under EDCA) move from:

  • ➡️ Peripheral partners to
  • ➡️ Strategic nodes

This raises:

  • Exposure risk
  • Political pressure
  • Alignment dilemmas

Thus, Strait of Hormuz closure is not just a Middle East problem. For the Philippines, it is:

  • ✔ An energy crisis trigger
  • ✔ An inflation shock
  • ✔ A remittance risk
  • ✔ A maritime trade disruption
  • ✔ A geopolitical stress test

And most importantly, it reminds Manila that conflicts staged far away can still arrive economically first… and strategically later….

Prof. Anna Rosario Malindog-Uy

Prof. Anna Rosario Malindog-Uy is a Ph.D. Candidate at the Institute of South-South Cooperation and Development (ISSCAD), Peking University, Beijing, China. Currently, she is a Senior Researcher of the South China Sea Probing Initiative (SCSPI) and a Senior Research Fellow of the Global Governance Institution (GGI). Prof. Anna Uy taught Political Science, International Relations, Development Studies, European Studies, Southeast Asia, and China Studies. She is a researcher-writer, academic, and consultant on a wide array of issues. She has worked as a consultant with the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and other local and international NGOs.